The events will take place Thursday, March 25, 2010 at Santa Monica College, Bundy Campus (Bundy 123) @ 3171 South Bundy Drive, LA CA 90066

For more information please visit: http://feministfatale.com/2010/03/waming-it-on-the-westside/ and also join the Facebook Event.

** You can watch, comment, share and subscribe on YouTube

In the new SyFy show Caprica we are introduced to a queer character, Sam Adama. Here is the good and the bad of his queer representation.

Check out other great blogs and commentary:

• “Ron Moore wants to include more gay characters in his shows.  That is fine.  Now, if he could just stop making them of a certain type.  So far, we have: Cylon Saboteurs and mentally insane Admirals, mutineers, cold-blooded Mafia-esque hitmen (here in Caprica, one of the Adama clan), and cold-blooded fanatical terrorists (Soldiers of the One in Caprica).” from “10 Brief Notes about Caprica“  (I took out the character names for Battlestar Galactica in case of Spoilers)

• “Representations of Gays and Lesbians in Film” an article from Media Awareness Network.

• 300: This is Revisionism is a remix about the movie 300. A section of it comments on the trope of homosexuality as manipulative evil.

Caprica and the Queerness of Sam Adama Transcript

Caprica is a new show in the SyFy Network that is actually set 58 years before the events of the reimagined Battlestar Galactica.  As I watched the second episode I noticed something said that was so subtle I almost missed it.

Clip: Caprica – Season 1 episode 2: “Rebirth”
Sam Adama “I used to hangout here with your dad.  All the Tauron kids came here.  I’d be hopelessly trying to flirt with some guy mean while your dad would get a date with his sister. [laugh]“

Did you catch that? Because that man just said he was gay and it wasn’t a big production, it wasn’t a big coming out story, it wasn’t said in big flashing lights, it was so normalized that I didn’t even notice it at first, I actually had to go back and listen to it again because I was like, “Ohhh.”  It just was in passing, how it should be.

That man’s name is Sam Adama and he’s part of the main cast on Caprica.  It’s also really nice to see that he’s not stereotypically gay like we often see in queer representations on TV.  Gay men are often flamboyant and obsessed with fashion.  You might recognize these men.

[[Images of Stanford from Sex and the City, the cast of Queer Eye for the Straight Guy, Will and Jack from Will and Grace.]]

But there is one teeny little problem.  Sam Adama is a murderer, he’s actually a hired hit man that’s apart of a gang.  He also isn’t your average killer in that, you know, he doesn’t dress in black and kill someone with a silencer quietly and then sneak back out of the house like we’ve come to see on television and movies.  NO, he uh, chooses to use two very large, very phallic knives, to slash open his victims in a grotesque and gruesome way.

Hollywood has a long history of making queer characters monsters and sociopaths and murderers who have no moral compass.  This trope is used in order to reinforce a fear of homosexuality.

So do you see the problem here?  On one hand you have this awesome representation of a queer character whose totally normalized in being queer, it’s not even an issue, it’s totally accepted in society and he’s not stereotypical in that way.  On the other hand, he’s kind of crazy and he’s a murderer.

Just when I want to celebrate a genuine accomplishment of Hollywood they have to  go make the queer man disturbingly evil.

Political Remix Video is a genre of transformative guerilla media production whereby creators challenge dominant media messages through re-cutting and re-framing fragments of mainstream media and popular culture. Fan videos or “vids” set remixed footage from TV shows or movies to music. They are often used to subvert the traditional canon or tell an alternative story.  If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at anita [at] feministfrequency.com

Speakers:
Julie Levin Russo (Stanford) and Alexis Lothian (USC)
Jonathan McIntosh, creator of Buffy vs Edward
Hosted by Anita Sarkeesian (FeministFrequency.com)

Location and Time info:
Thursday March 25, 2010 at 12:30pm
California State University, Northridge
18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, CA 91330
Armer Theater, Manzanita Hall, Rm 100
View a map of the campus

Also check out the facebook event page.  You can also view an enlarged flyer image.

Reel Grrls is a great organization dedicated to providing media literacy and filmmaking skills to young women in the Seattle area. You can see details and sign up for the workshop here and also take a look at the great videos Reel Grrls have made on their YouTube and Vimeo channels.

Although, Reel Grrls afterschool programs and workshop are usually reserved for young women between the ages of 9 and 19, they have decided to open up the videoblogging workshop to women of all ages!

Click here to view the embedded video.

** You can watch, comment, share and subscribe on YouTube

The Bechdel Test is a simple way to gauge the active presence of female characters in Hollywood films and just how well rounded and complete those roles are.  It was created by Allison Bechdel in her comic strip Dykes to Watch Out For in 1985.  It is astonishing the number of popular movies that can’t pass this simple test.  It demonstrates how little women’s complex and interesting lives are underrepresented or non existent in the film industry.  We have jobs, creative projects, friendships and struggles among many other things that are actually interesting in our lives… so Hollywood, start writing about it!

Check out other great blogs and commentary about the Bechdel Test:

1. The Bechdel Test Movie List: here you can find a long, long list of movies and where they rate on the Bechdel Test.
2. Why Film Schools Teach Screenwriters Not to Pass the Bechdel Test’s by Jennifer Kesler.  This is a must read – exposing the systemic problems of the film industry starting with film school.
3. See the original comic strip “The Rule” here.
4. You can visit Allison Bechdel’s site here and I highly recommend her graphic novel Fun Home
5. Over at the Blog “The Angry Black Woman” she adapted the Bechdel Test to apply to race.  Take a look: The Bechdel Test and Race in Popular Fiction

The Bechdel Test for Women and Movies Transcript

The Bechdel Test or the Mo Movie Measure is a type of litmus test to assess the presence of women in movies.  It originated from Allison Bechdel’s comic “Dykes to Watch Out For” in 1985.  Here’s how it works, a movie just has to pass these three simple questions: the first, are there two or more women in it who have names, the second, do they talk to each other, and the third, do they talk to each other about something other then a man.

It’s quite extraordinary actually how many movies don’t pass this test cause it’s not even a sign of whether its a feminist movie or whether its a good movie just that there is female presence in it and that they actually are engaging about things other then men.

To prove that this is actually a systemic problem and not just a few movies here and there, I can show you a couple films that don’t pass the test.

The Dark Knight
District 9
Slumdog Millionaire
Terminator Salvation
GI Joe
Shrek
Watchmen
Bourne Supremacy
Bourne Identity
Transformers
Bruno
Hackers
Ghostbusters
The Big Lebowski
Wall-E
Wanted
Ocean’s Twelve
Clerks
Pirates of the Caribbean 1, 2 and 3
Austin Powers 1, 2 and 3
Men in Black
Fight Club
The Fifth Element
The Princess Bride
Hellboy 2
Milk
The Wedding Singer
Shawshank Redemption
Reservoir Dogs
Point Break
Quantum of Solace 007
Indiana Jones
Alien 3
Lord of the Rings 1, 2 and 3
Ferris Bueller’s Day Off
The Truman Show
From Dusk till Dawn
Trainspotting
Mission Impossible
Braveheart
Toy Story
Gladiator
X Men
Wolverine
When Harry Met Sally
Back to the Future 1, 2 and 3
Tomb Raider
Pulp Fiction
Interview with the Vampire
Seven
Home Alone
Up

Okay you get the point, this is only just a few films out of the many films that don’t pass this test.  When I call it a systemic problem what I mean by this is that it’s not just a few people here and there that don’t like women, or don’t want women’s stories told, but that rather the entire industry is built upon and creating films and movies that cater to and are about men.

Next time you go to the movies just ask yourself these few questions.  Are there two or more women in it and do they have names?  Do they talk to each other?  And do they talk to each other about something other then a man?

You’ll also find me helping out Jonathan Mcintosh (of Rebelliouspixels.com) on Wednesday December 9th, 2009 who is doing a remix workshop with the Reel Grrls Thesis class.

Click here to view the embedded video.

** You can watch, comment, share and subscribe on YouTube

Here is an easy to follow guide for the guys on the right versus the wrong reasons to hate on Twilight.  With the release of New Moon, there has been an awful lot of sexist, homophobic, patriarchal crap floating around the internet and I just wanted to set the record straight.

Check out other great blogs and commentary about the Twilight Series:

1. The creator of Buffy vs Edward (and my partner!) also wrote What Would Buffy Do? Notes on Dusting Edward Cullen about why he made the remix.
2. Bite Me or Don’t over at Bitch Media is a great look at the repercussions of this new wave of young adult fiction and what the author is calling abstinence porn.
3. Twilight’s Bella Swan is a Feminist’s Worst Nightmare breaks down the many troubling aspects of Bella’s character

This video can be viewed with English subtitles at DotSub and is available to be translated into other languages.

The Real Reasons Guys Should Hate Twilight Transcript

I just want to clear up a little confusion with the guys about the right reasons and the wrong reasons to hate on Twilight.  These are the wrong reasons:

Clip: Ben Hoffman at Infomania
Ben: Thought it was gonna be about a bunch of badass vampires who wanted to kill people and drink their blood, but no it was some teenage p**&% who didn’t want to kill people instead he just wanted to be sensitive and play piano.
Game Show Buzzer Sound

Clip: The Spill Crew
Man: That’s why I like the werewolves because when the vampire start like saying “I can’t be with you because I’m too sensitive and I’m risking our lives”
Woman scream
Man: The werewolves come in and ‘f*&% the vampires’
Game Show Buzzer Sound

And then also the endless array of “He’s so gay” comments on YouTube”
Game Show Buzzer Sound

So just to recap the wrong reasons are that Edward is too sensitive, that he’s gay, and that he’s not violent enough.  The right reasons however, are that Edward is a creepy, manipulative, controlling, overprotective, stalker.  Ultimately what you dude’s are saying is that in addition to being emotionally abuse you want Edward to be violent, sadistic and physically abusive.

So next time you are with your buddies talking about how much you hate Twilight, you can just repeat after me.  I hate Twilight because Edward is a creepy, manipulative, overprotective stalker.

Click here to view the embedded video.

** You can watch, comment, share and subscribe on YouTube

From the first time I heard about the concept behind HBO’s True Blood I was a little bit horrified.  Vampires are “coming out of the coffin” and want equal rights?  Since television producers (and especially HBO) want to make shows that are as sensational and scandalous as possible, I had my doubts about whether they could provide commentary about social justice struggles in America without being painfully offensive, ignorant and stereotypical.  I am unhappy to report that, no, they completely failed.

Check out other great blogs and commentary about True Blood:

• Great commentary as always from the brilliant minds at Racialicious. 1. True Blood Tired Stereotypes and 2. Scattered Thoughts on True Blood

• Another great article from Latoya Peterson Vampires and the Sluts and Virgins Who Love Them she draws a comparison between the representation of sex in True Blood and Buffy the Vampire Slayer

• Some interesting observations from Michelle Goldberg at the Daily Beast – Vampire Conservatives

True Blood Vlog Transcript

Vampires, Vampires, Vampires, they’re everywhere and they want equal rights too damnnit.  Yes, I’m talking about True Blood.  The problem I have with True Blood is I feel like its structurally flawed.  The writers are equating Vampire Rights with the struggle of civil rights and queer rights.  Let’s be clear, vampires are evil, manipulative, blood sucking, monsterous, undead beings.  Now to equate these evil beings with Black folks and Queer folks is not a far cry from the actual accusations against Black folks and Queer folks, both historically and currently.  To make a show that’s this sort of serious drama but fun commentary is offensive at best.

Good ol’ Sookie Stackhouse who this story is actually based on.  She’s sooo boring, really… okay, I take that back, there are somethings that are interesting about her like the psychic ability is kind of interesting, but ultimately, she is the white, female, blonde, cute, virginal protagonist which is very typical there’s not anything super special about that representation.  I do appreciate that she stands up to Bill occasionally even though she always goes back to him and even though he’s still this ‘I have to save you’ creepy guy, just having those little lines, you know, makes me happier in general and I think its also a good representation for women to see that resistance, it just falls short constantly because she still goes back to his ridiculous patriarchal behaviour.  In season two there’s a really great example of the backlash against women if they want to defend themselves against their patriarchal boyfriends.

True Blood Clip Season 2 episode 3: Scratches
Bill: That does not give you license to behave like an irresponsible child!  She is a loaded gun Sookie, not a doll for you to dress up and play with.  What are you doing?
Sookie: Walking
Bill: Don’t be ridiculous Bon Temps is nearly twenty miles away
Sookie: I’d rather walk all night then spend another second in that car with you

Next scene
Sookie: What the hell?  Scream

So now look what happens.  Sookie’s getting punished by a near death experience because she decided to stick up for herself.  Now that’s not cool, I mean the writers are writing this, they could have written it in any other way but instead they’re going with the very archaic story line of women as fragile and need to be protected and don’t you dare stick up for yourself or be strong willed.

Now Bill the other main character is also incredibly boring and annoying and you would think that if you’ve been alive for a hundred and some odd years, you would adjust to the way of life now just like every other vampire on the show has, but no, you don’t.  Bill is positioned as this sort of romantic, old school, ‘I’m gonna take care of you and respect you’ but it’s just so contrived and really messed up, I mean do we really want to celebrate these old sort of victorian ways of engaging with relationships?  I mean almost every other word out of his mouth is something about having to protect Sookie.

True Blood Clips Season 1 & 2
Bill: The more people know what you do the harder it is for me to protect you
Bill: Sookie must be protected
Bill: And I need you to watch over Sookie, protect her while I’m gone
Bill: My only desire is to keep you safe

And now Sookie will demonstrate the appropriate response to these comments.

True Blood Clip Season 1:
Sookie: Shut the fuck up

Tara is Sookie’s best friend and I really like Tara, I think that she is really kind of dynamic and interesting.  I really believe her character, I believe that she has had a really messed up childhood and her mom’s an alcoholic and she’s lashed out and been promiscuous and hasn’t had the emotional support and doesn’t really know how to, you know, love herself because nobody has ever really loved her.  So that when this evil god like creature masked as a beautiful woman, who eats a lot of organic food, comes in and gives her that emotional love and support she’s gonna fall for that.  I buy that.  What I don’t buy, is that unfortunately even though I think Tara is really interesting she’s still the Black sidekick.  She’s still the loud, pompous, aggressive, hypersexualized Black woman.

Lafayette, oh, you know we all love him, He’s really dynamic and really interesting and funny and he has definitely some choice lines BUT he is every stereotype about Black Queer men all rolled into one little pretty package and it constantly infuriates me.  Because we don’t want to reinforces these stereotypes, we want to dispel them, and break them down and make very interesting and complicated textured characters that are beyond stereotypes BUT NO, True Blood can’t do that.  We see Lafayette working in the kitchen of Merlotte’s but on the side he’s also a prostitute, and he runs his own porn website and he’s a drug dealer.  I mean really, could there be any other stereotypes thrown in here?  Putting Lafayette’s character into the greater context of the True Blood universe there is no other Black men and no other Queer men on the main cast so he’s really all we get in terms of alternative sexuality and as far as Black male masculinity.

Eric’s character has developed a lot more in season two and I’m kind of disturbed by the direction its going.  So in season one, we establish that he’s this pompous, arrogant, sort of quiet but very powerful asshole.  He doesn’t really care about humans very much, they’re just kind of toys to him and he can get whatever he wants because he’s the most powerful vampire in the area.  So in season two we start to see a bit of his emotion as far as being concerned about his maker, and he even cries, which I think its totally acceptable and great that men are crying on television but I don’t think that gives us license to feel sympathy or traction towards Eric.  I think that he is still continuing to be a perpetrator really.  The scene in which he tricks Sookie into drinking his blood is really reminincent of sexual assault and unfortuantely that sexual assault hasn’t been dealt with in a respectful way.  So he thinks that its totally okay and funny that he did that, Sookie’s pissed but what is she gonna do?  And he gets to emotionally stalk her.

I think it’s characters like Eric and the scene that I described that really reminds me that there are people behind the scenes who are purposely writing things and get to choose which direction these stories and characters go and more often then not, they are not in the direction in which fans want to see them, especially female fans, because we live with the constant fear of violence towards us on a daily basis we don’t need that to be dealt with on TV in a very negative dismissive sort of way.

I could probably go on for hours about the specifics about how messed up True Blood is but I will leave you just with those gems and I’m also going to provide some links to some really awesome articles that talk more indepthly about race and gender in True Blood.

Music in background: I don’t know who you think you are but before the night is through, I wanna do bad things with you

Click here to view the embedded video.

** You can watch, comment, share and subscribe on YouTube

Veronica Mars has got to be one of my favourite shows of all time.  No seriously, it’s funny, witty, smart, progressive.  Women are technologically savvy, the privilege of white rich kids are exposed (well sort of…), and it generally has progressive commentary.  Watch this video for the things I loved about the show and also the more problematic elements… and keep watching because I included some hilarious and entertaining clips from the show.

ps.  Steer clear of season three, my love for the show ended during the last episode of season 2.

Check out other great blogs and commentary about Veronica Mars:

• Great commentary and analysis by The Hathor Legacy “Veronica Mars: Grade is Not the Verb I’d Choose” and also commentary about sexual violence in the show written in three parts entitled “Rape in Veronica Mars” read here: Part 1 – Part 2 – Part 3.  Many of the situations they write about are in the third season of VM, which I will comment more about in another video.

• Reactions about the third season of Veronica Mars from “Across the Pond” -  “Et Tu Veronica Mars“

• This article at Other Magazine talks about Veronica Mars and Dr. Who trying to emulate the strong empowered female character that we so many fans loved about Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

Also check out this wonderful vid by Keewick which exposes some of the sexual violence issues in Veronica Mars.

**Update: You can now see my clip review about how the writers used wit and humour to talk about gender and class in Veronica Mars over at Critical Commons.

Video Blog Transcript

I love veronica mars I think it’s an absolutely brilliant show.  It only had a short run of three seasons and only two of which were actually watchable.  The third season has sort of been written off as a fluke, there were a lot of problems with it but I’ll save that for another video, that said you should go out immediately and bit torrent, pirate rent buy, whatever you have to do to watch Veronica Mars because it will totally be worth it.

It’s a show about a teenage detective she actually learned the tricks of the trade from her father who is a private detective and she often solves problems at school, she even solves crimes that the local sheriff’s department are unable to solve.  The show is actually really funny, it’s got great wit, great humour and I would actually compare it to Joss Whedon’s writing in Buffy the Vampire Slayer and maybe even say its a little bit better?  Joss Whedon did a cameo during Season 2 because he thought the show was so good.  and so did Courtney from the Dandy Warhols and Kevin Smith.

One of the things that drew me in immediately to the show was how technologically savvy Veronica Mars is.  It’s a pretty rare representation to have young women shown as super knowledgeable about all different technologies, so you see her often using computers and having a really good understanding of how they work.  She’s also and excellent photographer, printers, scanners all that sort of stuff.  She also has a lot of different spy gadgets, so she can take apart an iPod and put in a hidden camera that can take a photo every five seconds for example or track people through GPS or put recording devices in cars.  There is also another teenage woman at Veronica’s school named Mac, who is also super tech savvy, Veronica met up with her because she needed some help with the computer systems at school and Mac knew everything about them so throughout the television series she is constantly going to Mac asking her for help on how to break into wifi networks, and how to create websites and hack into different things and they work together as pair on various projects.

Very little violence is used on the show to solve problems  but it’s not a world without violence so it kind of comes in two forms on the show.  The first is really awkward and clumsy, so you’ll have two teenage boys beating each other up and throwing punches and kind of missing but it’s not like they’re trained in martial arts they’re just really awkward.  The second way shows how horrific and egregious  violence actually is.  It makes your stomach kind of turn as you are watching the show.  I think that these characteristics and representations of violence on Veronica Mars really helps to show us how violence is used on other shows to solve problems, how easy it is to write violence as a solution as opposed to coming up with really creative ways to deal with different problems.

Veronica Mars Clip Season 1 Episode 14: Mars vs. Mars
Veronica: Well she’s giving a statement at the sheriff’s department tomorrow, I’ll drop by and see if she’s up for a chat
Logan: Well I’ll go with you
Veronica: Actually despite popular opinion you really can’t beat the truth out of someone

Instead of using violence Veronica gets really creative and cleaver with the way that she solves her cases.  At the resolution of each show the viewer is left with this sense of poetic justice. An example of this poetic justice is when Veronica kind of gets back at her boyfriend Troy who she finds out later on that he was kind of scamming her the whole time.

Veronica Mars Clip Season 1 Episode 5: You Think You Know Someone
Shauna: Troy what’s with this girl calling me? You gave her my number?
Troy: oh whoa what girl?
Shauna: Some girl named Veronica
Troy: You didn’t tell her you’d be seeing me did you?
Shauna: She caught me off guard, what was I suppos– (phone clicks)
Veronica Voice Over: Sorry we didn’t get a chance to say goodbye, just wanted to wish you luck at your new school and leave you something to remember me by.  It took me awhile to figure out where you stashed the steroids but there was only one place where you were alone right?  In case you were wondering the former contents of the package are somewhere between my toilet and the pacific ocean.  Say hi to Shauna for me, she sounds like a keeper
Troy: Damnit!

The show is of course not without its faults, it has some problematic portrayals of racism and classism, but it does actually acknowledge those things and talks about them throughout the show, this is in comparison to most mainstream television shows that don’t even really acknowledge that racism or classism exist.  I think that even though it talks about it in a sort of problematic way, just having that on our television screens is just a step towards making out television programs more anti racist more anti classist.  When I first started watching the show we were introduced to the local Latino biker gang and I was really fearful that the writers were going to feed into the very racist stereotypes, which they kind of did.  But the writers also took the main leader of the gang and sort of humanized him, really showed a bit of his back story and made the audience sympathetic and made a really complex character.  There are also other moments in the show where the writers gave us really subtle and interesting and also humourous ways of exposing racism that you don’t often think about, and you almost never see that on TV.

Veronica Mars Clip Season 2 Episode 13: Ain’t No Magic Mountain High Enough
Vice Principal: We’re gonna have to start searching the lockers… immediately.
Madison: Wanna save yourself some time start with hers, we all saw her, lurking around.
Jackie: Lurking? Ah you mean standing while Black?

Sexual Violence is a reoccurring theme throughout all three seasons of the show. I think that for the most part, the writers did a really really terrible job of dealing with rape and abuse and because of that I’m going to dedicate a whole other video blog to it because I think that it really needs to be exposed just how important it is to deal with sexual violence in a healthy manner on television.  Overall I really really like the show, I would highly recommend season one and two, I think that there is a lot of really great things about it as far as the complexity of characters, it’s entertaining and witty, it’s really fun to watch.  Veronica’s relationship with her father is totally worth watching because they are really funny but its also this mutual love and respect they have for one another and there is a lot of really progressive values that the show offers and I think that is fairly rare to see on TV.  That said, I’m going to leave you with this clip that I think is wonderfully subtle.

Veronica Mars Clip Season 1 Episode 5: You Think You Know Someone
Keith Mars: Wow that’s some cake
Veronica Mars: Isn’t it though
Keith Mars: I love it.  Ever notice how everything you make tends to lean a little to the left
Veronica Mars: I do that on purpose
Keith Mars laughs

Click here to view the embedded video.

** You can watch, comment, share and subscribe on YouTube

Fox Networks decided to renew Dollhouse for another 13 episodes but canceled Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles.  I’m less then thrilled about this decision.

Links Referenced in Video:

• Whedonesque.com: Joss talks about the Dollhouse renewal
• Washington Post Article: Fox Execs Keep Playing With ‘Dollhouse’

Update: There are some really great conversations about Dollhouse on The Angry Black Woman “The problem with Dollhouse is not that I don’t understand subtlety” and on Feminist SF “Working in the Dollhouse”

Also please check out this amazing fan vid about Dollhouse It Depends on What You Pay.   Brilliantly edited by Gianduja Kiss to expose some of the more controversial aspects of the show.  Word of warning, it’s kind of intense.

This video can be viewed with English subtitles at DotSub and is available to be translated into other languages.

Video Blog Transcript

I just found out that Dollhouse is being renewed by Fox for another season.  It’s a Joss Whedon TV show so I wanted to give it a chance when it first started.  Dollhouse is a show about a bunch of people who get there brains wiped and then new personalities and experiences and memories get put into their heads and they can exist as that person for X amount of time and they get hired out by clients to perform various tasks.  Most of the “engagements” are men trying to fulfill a fantasy.  Dollhouse is really a glorified brothel, Dollhouse is really misogynistic, I don’t know what other word to describe it as.  There is a big issue that has really been raised about whether this is rape or not.  It’s been talked about a little bit online but the show hasn’t dealt with this issue at all.  So they sign these contracts saying that they’ll be in Dollhouse for X amount of years and their conscious mind isn’t around so they can’t consent to every single engagement that they go on.  Now if you can’t consent then that would be rape right?

In Dollhouse we as the viewer are supposed to condemn the dollhouse, we’re not supposed to like it, we’re supposed to think it’s morally and ethically wrong to do these things to these people yet we identify with all of the characters in the dollhouse.  So Boyd the handler, you think he’s pretty cool because he seems to have issues with what’s going on, yet he still continues to work there.  The woman who runs the place, towards the end of the season we start to get more of an emotional grasp on her and her character gets more complicated so we become even more entrenched in who she is not, you know, not hating her.  Tofur the crazy scientist, you totally think he’s funny and witty and smart and goofy, you don’t really take him too seriously.  If we’re not supposed to like dollhouse, which I think we’re not supposed to then why are we sympathetic with all of the characters inside of the dollhouse?

Joss Whedon on Whedonesque.com was quoted as saying that part of the pitch to renew for a second season was that they were going to go in the direction of the season finale.  I think we have enough crazy, serial killing, murdering men on television that we don’t need to add to the repertoire with dollhouse.  The season finale was just blah cover my ears cover my eyes, I didn’t want to watch a single other episode of Dollhouse after that.  It was just so grotesquely violent, it was unnecessary, it’s this crazy maniacal guy who was damaged by the dollhouse (which were sympathetic to right) doing all these crazy things so now he becomes the enemy and the dollhouse is kind of in that grey middle zone area.

This news is troubling in that I really didn’t want Terminator: the Sarah Connor Chronicles to get cancelled.  I thought it was a really good show.  I felt like the story line and the characters were really complex.  They made complicated relationships between each other and the characters evolved in interesting ways that I thought could grow over another couple of seasons.  Also the show is based on the Terminator movies which most of us have probably seen which are kind of big macho fests about you know, gore and violence and blowing things up and robots, the whole sci fi chase scene thing.  But Sarah Connor, although it had those elements, was actually really smart.  It fused together the action part of the sci fi genre but it also brought in character development that I thought was really well done.  The show is also mostly about a woman, she’s an independent, tough, single mom that’s trying to protect her son.  The other main character on the show is a representation of a teenage woman who although she’s a robot you still see as young female.  She’s empowered, she’s smart, she’s strong, these are all good things to have on television I think.  I think looking really critically at a show why Dollhouse is being renewed and the Sarah Connor Chronicles are not… the Sarah Connor Chronicles really took its time and sometimes it was a little slow moving because they really did a lot of character development, and really built up a story line so you really became attached to what was going on and really invested.  Where in Dollhouse you met a new character every week.  It wasn’t really super complicated, you didn’t have a lot of character development.  There were a few things here and there where the main character, Echo started to remember her old past but even then it wasn’t that interesting and it was kind of the same old same old.

There was a really interesting article in the Washington Post that talked about how Dollhouse was produced by Fox and aired on the Network of Fox so they have more invested in that financially and can make more profits.  Where Sarah Connor was produced by Warner Brothers aired on Fox, there’s not as much financial investment.  I know that Joss Whedon is capable of writing really good quality television that’s critical and analytical and has social commentary while still being entertaining and fun.  So I don’t know why he can’t do that again.